October 15, 2021
Best Horror Streaming Services for 2024
There are plenty of horror streaming sites out there to choose from, but even after getting a [...]
WHAT’S IN THIS REVIEW?
Disclaimer: Partnerships & affiliate links help us create better content. Learn how.
A decline in online freedom has stretched the globe in 2021 as the internet begins to feel smaller. Freedom House research found that “China ranks as the worst environment for internet freedom for the seventh year in a row.” That’s not unexpected, but what about the Western world?
They noted that in the United States “false, misleading, and manipulated information continued to proliferate online, even affecting public acceptance of the 2020 presidential election results.”
Meanwhile, big tech companies have clearly failed to self-govern in recent years, leading to the prospect of state intervention at an unprecedented scale. More regulation is likely to lead to less freedom unless robust data privacy legislation works to protect encryption. For now, that seems unlikely.
It’s been a tough year for internet freedom, as we take a look at the best and worst countries according to recent data.
The concept of “Internet Freedom” relates to a set of standards that allow for the right to expression, the right to freedom of assembly and association, the right to have access to information, and the right to privacy when using digital tech.
In many ways, it’s an extension of the rights we enjoy as individuals, expanded to protect us while we’re online.
These rights are disregarded every day, especially in terms of online privacy and access to information. Governments may ban digital services, or there may be a lack of transparency in terms of censorship, surveillance, and content manipulation.
Some nations are far worse than others, but no country has been able to record a perfect score. Regardless, we all suffer from a lack of internet freedom to some degree.
It’s tough to define a level of internet freedom, especially as any nations affected are likely to disagree with the findings. The best measurement is likely Freedom House, which is a Washington DC-based democracy advocacy group that was founded in 1941.
They’ve assessed the level of internet freedom in 70 countries around the world through an annual Freedom on the Net report – its latest findings released in 2021. They judge freedom scores based on criteria such as obstacles to access, limits on content, and violations of user rights.
Country | Total Score | Obstacles to Access | Limits on Content | Violations of User Rights |
Iceland | 96 | 25 | 34 | 37 |
Estonia | 94 | 25 | 32 | 37 |
Canada | 87 | 23 | 32 | 32 |
Costa Rica | 87 | 20 | 33 | 34 |
Taiwan | 80 | 24 | 31 | 25 |
Germany | 79 | 22 | 29 | 28 |
France | 78 | 23 | 30 | 25 |
United Kingdom | 78 | 23 | 30 | 25 |
Georgia | 77 | 19 | 31 | 27 |
Italy | 76 | 21 | 30 | 25 |
Japan | 76 | 21 | 29 | 26 |
United States | 75 | 21 | 29 | 25 |
Australia | 75 | 23 | 27 | 25 |
Country | Iceland |
Total Score | 96 |
Obstacles to Access | 25 |
Limits on Content | 34 |
Violations of User Rights | 37 |
Country | Estonia |
Total Score | 94 |
Obstacles to Access | 25 |
Limits on Content | 32 |
Violations of User Rights | 37 |
Country | Canada |
Total Score | 87 |
Obstacles to Access | 23 |
Limits on Content | 32 |
Violations of User Rights | 32 |
Country | Costa Rica |
Total Score | 87 |
Obstacles to Access | 20 |
Limits on Content | 33 |
Violations of User Rights | 34 |
Country | Taiwan |
Total Score | 80 |
Obstacles to Access | 24 |
Limits on Content | 31 |
Violations of User Rights | 25 |
Country | Germany |
Total Score | 79 |
Obstacles to Access | 22 |
Limits on Content | 29 |
Violations of User Rights | 28 |
Country | France |
Total Score | 78 |
Obstacles to Access | 23 |
Limits on Content | 30 |
Violations of User Rights | 25 |
Country | United Kingdom |
Total Score | 78 |
Obstacles to Access | 23 |
Limits on Content | 30 |
Violations of User Rights | 25 |
Country | Georgia |
Total Score | 77 |
Obstacles to Access | 19 |
Limits on Content | 31 |
Violations of User Rights | 27 |
Country | Italy |
Total Score | 76 |
Obstacles to Access | 21 |
Limits on Content | 30 |
Violations of User Rights | 25 |
Country | Japan |
Total Score | 76 |
Obstacles to Access | 21 |
Limits on Content | 29 |
Violations of User Rights | 26 |
Country | United States |
Total Score | 75 |
Obstacles to Access | 21 |
Limits on Content | 29 |
Violations of User Rights | 25 |
Country | Australia |
Total Score | 75 |
Obstacles to Access | 23 |
Limits on Content | 27 |
Violations of User Rights | 25 |
With no real surprises, Iceland heads the list, closely followed by Estonia. Canada and Costa Rica are up next, followed by Taiwan and Germany.
Iceland was ranked as the best environment for internet freedom for the third year in a row, garnering a near-perfect score of 96 points out of 100.
Estonian e-Governance expert Hille Hinsberg responded to the findings, explaining:
“Estonia, known in the world as one of the most advanced digital societies, enjoys good connectivity and high rates of access, few state-imposed restrictions on online content, and robust safeguards for human rights online.”
With a score of 87 for Canada, Freedom House notes:
“Canada has a strong history of respect for political rights and civil liberties, though in recent years citizens have been concerned about the scope of government surveillance laws and privacy rights.”
This makes sense considering Canada is a part of the secretive Five Eyes (FVEY) intelligence alliance, which also includes Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
2021 has been a difficult year for internet freedom across the globe. Freedom House found that “the greatest deteriorations were documented in Myanmar, Belarus, and Uganda, where state forces cracked down amid electoral and constitutional crises. Myanmar’s 14-point score decline is the largest registered since the Freedom on the Net project began.”
Then there’s the sheer difference between China and Taiwan, with a 70-point gap despite being separated by only 110 miles of water.
The “worst” 10 countries for internet freedom according to their data is as follows:
Country | Total Score | Obstacles to Access | Limits on Content | Violations of User Rights |
China | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
Iran | 16 | 8 | 5 | 3 |
Myanmar | 17 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
Cuba | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
Vietnam | 22 | 12 | 6 | 4 |
Saudi Arabia | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 |
Pakistan | 25 | 5 | 13 | 7 |
Egypt | 26 | 12 | 10 | 4 |
Ethiopia | 27 | 4 | 12 | 11 |
UAE | 27 | 12 | 9 | 6 |
Country | China |
Total Score | 10 |
Obstacles to Access | 8 |
Limits on Content | 2 |
Violations of User Rights | 0 |
Country | Iran |
Total Score | 16 |
Obstacles to Access | 8 |
Limits on Content | 5 |
Violations of User Rights | 3 |
Country | Myanmar |
Total Score | 17 |
Obstacles to Access | 4 |
Limits on Content | 7 |
Violations of User Rights | 6 |
Country | Cuba |
Total Score | 21 |
Obstacles to Access | 5 |
Limits on Content | 9 |
Violations of User Rights | 7 |
Country | Vietnam |
Total Score | 22 |
Obstacles to Access | 12 |
Limits on Content | 6 |
Violations of User Rights | 4 |
Country | Saudi Arabia |
Total Score | 24 |
Obstacles to Access | 12 |
Limits on Content | 8 |
Violations of User Rights | 4 |
Country | Pakistan |
Total Score | 25 |
Obstacles to Access | 5 |
Limits on Content | 13 |
Violations of User Rights | 7 |
Country | Egypt |
Total Score | 26 |
Obstacles to Access | 12 |
Limits on Content | 10 |
Violations of User Rights | 4 |
Country | Ethiopia |
Total Score | 27 |
Obstacles to Access | 4 |
Limits on Content | 12 |
Violations of User Rights | 11 |
Country | UAE |
Total Score | 27 |
Obstacles to Access | 12 |
Limits on Content | 9 |
Violations of User Rights | 6 |
China, Iran, and Myanmar make up the bottom three. Cuba dropped a point compared to last year, while Vietnam still has stringent restrictions for online content.
In Vietnam’s case, the state continued mandating that companies “remove content and impose draconian criminal sentences for online expression.” Online political organizing was also sharply restricted ahead of their May 2021 legislative elections.
Meanwhile, every Middle Eastern and North African country is either “partly free” or “not free”, with Tunisia the highest in the region earning a score of 63. Lebanon, Libya, Jordan, and the UAE also saw a decline during 2020.
Of all countries, China leads the way when it comes to internet censorship.
They have national firewalls that work to block the majority of foreign media and websites, while an online database of speech crimes in the country lists over 2,100 times when the government punished people for what they said online and offline.
VPN | Lowest Price | Countries | # of Devices |
---|---|---|---|
NordVPN | $3.99/mo. | 60 | 6 |
Surfshark | $2.49/mo. | 95 | Unlimited |
ExpressVPN | $8.32/mo. | 94 | 5 |
Astrill VPN | $10/mo. | 58 | 5 |
Windscribe | $1/mo. | 63 | Unlimited |
The best way to bypass internet restrictions safely is with a secure VPN. This is especially important if you live in a nation with fewer internet freedoms. A VPN creates a secure connection between your device and their servers, ensuring that your ISP or government can’t be sure of what you’re up to.
VPNs are blocked in Myanmar, Turkey, Uganda, the UAE, and Venezuela, while they’re illegal in Belarus, China, Iran, Iraq, Oman, Russia, and Turkmenistan.
Every nation is prone to some level of internet restriction, so anyone can benefit from the use of a VPN for privacy. We’ve listed some of the best services if you’re hoping to bypass restrictions in any of the countries mentioned above.
NordVPN has long been seen as one of the optimal picks for users who value privacy above all else. Based in Panama, one of many security features they have on offer is DoubleVPN, which reroutes your data through encrypted channels twice. In addition, it comes with Onion Over VPN and an ad-blocker coined CyberSec that blocks websites known for hosting malware or phishing scams.
NordVPN also has a proprietary protocol called NordLynx, built using WireGuard as a basis. This means they’re able to offer premium speeds with unbreakable encryption. If you’re looking to expand your internet access, NordVPN is a sure way to achieve this.
Another audited VPN with a lot to offer, Surfshark has a network consisting of 3,200+ servers in over 60 countries. It’s also one of the more affordable services to make the list, which is always worth taking into account.
SurfShark is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands to benefit from local data laws. All servers support P2P torrents, come with a Private DNS, and collect zero logs. That’s a decent privacy package. Check out our Surfshark review if you’d like to find out more.
ExpressVPN is another great VPN to consider thanks to its thousands of servers and powerful obfuscation technology. Like Surfshark, ExpressVPN is based in the privacy-friendly British Virgin Islands, and easily passes all IP/WebRTC/DNS leak tests we’ve thrown at it.
They’ve also conducted an independent audit of their VPN servers by PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers), last completed in 2021. In an effort to achieve transparency, they’ve also made the results public. ExpressVPN says:
“We’re so committed to ensuring we never store any sensitive data that we developed a new technology in-house, TrustedServer, to ensure that all data is wiped every time a server is rebooted.”
AstrillVPN is incorporated in The Republic of Seychelles. They note:
“We do not store any information or keep logs because the Astrill VPN Server Network is operated off-shore and there are no laws that obligate us to keep logs on our customers.”
They’re one of the few VPNs that are able to provide coverage in China, thanks to a nifty piece of tech called StealthVPN.
StealthVPN is a proprietary protocol developed by Astrill. It is inspired by OpenVPN and performs an additional obfuscation of traffic which makes it undetectable by most automated firewall systems.
The free version of Windscribe is capable, with generous limits and access to most features. For example, it’s one of our top picks for using a VPN in China.
The service is based in Canada. We’d normally avoid FVEY-affiliated nations when choosing a VPN, but they do offer the ability to pay anonymously with cryptocurrencies. They also offer a transparency report showing that “zero requests were complied with due to lack of relevant data.”
It’s known to consistently bypass firewalls and gain early access to geo-restricted content. Additionally, Windscribe supports P2P traffic and guarantees your online safety while streaming thanks to multiple encryption protocols, IP/DNS/WebRTC leak protection, and a kill switch.
No matter where you live, you’re likely to be subject to a range of internet restrictions.
This will be more sorely felt depending on your country of residence, and internet freedoms vary drastically depending on borderlines. (Take the example of China and Taiwan, which take a drastically different approach to policing online content.)
Data also seems to suggest that the situation is getting worse each year, due to electoral and constitutional crises, as well as the ongoing threat of misinformation.
Internet freedom can be defined using the following criteria:
Many online limitations can be bypassed by using a VPN, and we’d recommend finding one that’s a trusted, audited service that has a strict no-logs policy.
WHAT’S IN THIS REVIEW?
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
__cfduid | 1 month | The cookie is used by cdn services like CloudFlare to identify individual clients behind a shared IP address and apply security settings on a per-client basis. It does not correspond to any user ID in the web application and does not store any personally identifiable information. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | 1 year | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Advertisement". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 1 year | This cookies is set by GDPR Cookie Consent WordPress Plugin. The cookie is used to remember the user consent for the cookies under the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 1 year | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-non-necessary | 1 year | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Non-necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 1 year | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 1 year | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 1 year | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 1 year | No description |